Remove the `markdownify` call, and instead rely on Hugo's proper syntax; `{{% callout %}}` when we want to the content to be processed as Markdown.
This allows for stuff like:
{{% callout info %}}
##### I'm an info callout!
```css
.foo {
color: #fff;
}
```
{{< example >}}
<div class="alert alert-warning alert-dismissible fade show" role="alert">
<strong>Holy guacamole!</strong> You should check in on some of those fields below.
<button type="button" class="btn-close" data-dismiss="alert" aria-label="Close"></button>
</div>
{{< /example >}}
{{% /callout %}}
* Add disabled state example to the .form-control page
* Document disabled attribute on select too
* Add disabled example for file input
Co-authored-by: XhmikosR <xhmikosr@gmail.com>
* Expand on disabled fieldsets and faked buttons
include further advice/information on how to disable faked buttons for keyboard/AT users
* Centralise accessible name advice in forms overview
seems odd to only mention (separately) label, aria-label etc in input-group and layout. the advice is just as pertinent in other sections like select. checks only skims over this.
moving this, in expanded form, into the overview section itself. adding a specific cross-reference (just because they are easily left with no accname at all) in the checks page.
* Change warning about accessibility, modify server-side example
- paradoxically, due to our current problems with validation (see #28414) and the fact that browsers seem to have improved in this area for the most part, it's now actually better to use browser-native validation
- added explicit `id` and `aria-describedby` association to at least the server-side form error messages, to show how it should be done properly, and expanded the prose for that explaining this.
* Replace `.sr-only` with `.visually-hidden` in new addition
* Copy edits for clarity in parenthetical
* Copy and formatting tweaks
- Wordsmithing here and there
- Turns some hyphens into em dashes
- Turns a long running comma separated list into an unordered list
- Rearranges some copy just a bit
Co-authored-by: Mark Otto <markd.otto@gmail.com>
"screen readers" is quite reductive, as there are other assistive technologies. content hidden this way is even announced by things like Alexa/Siri etc, so it's not so much just "screen readers".
in the long run, we may even consider changing the actual classnames (maybe `.visually-hidden` / `.visually-hidden-focusable`, though admittedly that's a bit verbose).
also includes a tiny tweak to layout.md to generalise the note about using `.sr-only`
* Keep checks/radio toggle buttons on topic
- give examples of the pure toggle checks and radios, without the button group class. show that these work fine without `.btn-group`, but still cross-reference it
- move the explanation from "Checkbox toggle buttons" directly to "Toggle buttons", as the mention of using button classes applies equally to the subsequent "Radio toggle buttons" and "Outlined styles" subsections.
* Expand button group description
as it's not just single line, but vertical as well
* Expand button group examples
- add more colour ... `.btn-secondary` is just dull and uninspiring
- new section to showcase "Checkbox and radio button groups"
- add a mixed styles example
- add an example of vertical radio button group
* Rename `sr-only`/`sr-only-focusable`
To be more representative of the fact that these are not necessarily "screen reader" specific, but actually apply to assistive technologies in general (and also things like Alexa/Siri/etc). Goes hand-in-hand with #31133
Co-authored-by: XhmikosR <xhmikosr@gmail.com>
* Docs: improve/expand button documentation
- since we're not doing the disabled cursor thing anymore anyway, remove confusing/unnecessary mention for link-based disabled buttons
- make the disabled toggle example using a link actually follow the preceding advice of also having `tabindex="-1"` and `aria-disabled="true"`
- tweak the link functionality callout to also still mention `aria-disabled` to reinforce the idea
- tweak toggle state description (not just `<button>`s, but also links etc...so just remove mention of `<button>` there; also reinforce accessibility aspect once more)
- add a new callout that cross-references checkbox-based toggles, and what the similarity/difference between them is
- add a matching cross-reference callout to the checkbox-based toggle buttons page
* Update link to now renamed checks-radios.md
* Docs: rename form checks page to "Checks / radios"
it's not immediately obvious that "checks" includes information about both checkboxes and radio buttons. while "checks / radios" is also still not perfect (as honestly even I didn't quite grok that "checks" meant checkboxes), it should make it slightly more obvious nonetheless
